Climate change could sink N.S.

Published Wednesday August 20th, 2008

Rising seas could turn province into an island

A1

HALIFAX - When engineer Con Desplanque was working on Nova Scotia's dike system in the 1960s, the phrase "climate change" wasn't part of anyone's vocabulary.

"We never figured on a rising sea level when building the height of the dikes," Desplanque, now 90, said from his home in Amherst.

Desplanque has doubts the dikes can cope with storm surges that could spill over the neck of land that connects Nova Scotia to the rest of the country.

"There will be a time that the tide will be so high it will overtop (the dikes), and Nova Scotia will become an island for a couple of hours."

It wouldn't be the first time Canada briefly had two island provinces.

A storm surge and a higher-than-usual tide in the Bay of Fundy combined in 1869 to flood the area, known as the Chignecto Isthmus. The land bridge between Nova Scotia and New Brunswick was impassable for several days after the so-called Saxby Gale.

Bill Casey, the member of Parliament for the area, says he's concerned about the prospect of a similar weather event.

"It would completely flood the only rail link to Nova Scotia and the main highway to Nova Scotia," he said. "We'd have some really serious communications problems plus land loss and a tremendous loss of property."

Meanwhile, experts say the sea level in the area is projected to rise 70 centimetres over the next century.

The federal government has already identified the isthmus as highly sensitive to rising seas, and a large part of Prince Edward Island faces a similar threat.

As well, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change noted in its report last year that unless Nova Scotia continually raises its dikes, they won't protect the province from surging seas.

However, Desplanque knows that raising the dikes is easier said than done.

"The railway is on top of the dike and it will be a major effort to lift that dike to a higher level, because you'd first have to build another rail line."

The provincial government confirms the massive project would cost more than $40 million.

Please Log In or Register FREE

You are currently not logged into this site. Please log in or register for a FREE ONE Account.
Logged in visitors may comment on articles, enter contests, manage home delivery holds and much more online. Your ONE Account grants you access to features and content across the entire CanadaEast Network of sites.

Comments (8)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

So spend the money and fix it. This is the problem with the whole "climate change" fiasco, people say all these things that could happen, then think that the better plan is to dump tons of money into things that don't matter (like the pointless attempt to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere).

Fredericton spent more than $40 Million on construction this year. One city. You mean to tell me the entire province of NS (with, BTW, a higher population than NB) can't come up with the funding to protect itself from this?

The planet will do what it wants. Don't try to prevent it, do things to plan to deal with it.
6
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Darren M., Fredericton on 20/08/08 08:54:38 AM AST
Wow.... "The planet will do what it wants. Don't try to prevent it, do things to plan to deal with it." all I have to say is wow, any other comment is much too obvious... at least to anyone who actually knows anything about climate change.
2
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
V. M, Riverview on 20/08/08 09:34:30 AM AST
Oh, and do tell. What do you know about climate change? If you're trying to say that climate change is happening due to mankind, your argument is immediately flawed.
2
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Darren M., Fredericton on 20/08/08 10:36:01 AM AST
Darren, what do you know about climate change? I'll take the advice of the 1500 or so scientists from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, thank you. The point of all this is that global warming-climate change is happening, as unpredictable as it may be. How does taking that seriously harm you? Our society will build new cars and infrastructure and it will create new jobs in response to this crisis. That is, as long as the ignorant naysayers are denounced.
2
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
E. Sebastien, Moncton on 20/08/08 11:15:16 AM AST
They call people like that "sheep". They just follow the masses aimlessly due to what the media feed them. You realize that the "global warming" white paper put out by the IPCC has been dubunked as false and that many of the so-called scientists that had their names put on it (many without their consent) have left the IPCC, right? You realize that the IPCC has backed away from this already and suggested that now we are entering a cooling period, right? You realize that it has never been proven that humans are directly related to climate change, right?

Thanks, but I'd rather believe the facts I see for myself, not what a bunch of political paid-offs in the IPCC say. And the facts show that climate change has happened for millions of years without human intervention. Maybe it will warm up (though current trends suggest otherwise)...in which case, it would be stupid to try to stop it, and just spend the $400 million and protect the levees against overflow (the original topic).
2
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Darren M., Fredericton on 20/08/08 12:11:03 PM AST
So, you do believe the overflow will occur or may occur. You would spend the $40 million. What forces do you believe are behind this sea elevation?
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
E. Sebastien, Moncton on 20/08/08 01:41:53 PM AST
I think an examination of historical data alone shows that humanity after the industrial revolution has at least had some impact on climate change. The planet has heated and cooled over and over again for millions and billions of years, but it's never heated as quickly as it has in the last century (well, at least not in the last 10,000 years)

I mean, historical science is a big guessing game and no one can prove anything conclusively, but that doesn't stop it from being likely.
4
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
J. M, Moncton on 20/08/08 02:04:58 PM AST
The Earth has been warming for 15,000 years. The article should have been tittled "Climate change sunk PEI and could sink NS".

This way, the truth sounds a lot less alarming.
1
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
E. M, Moncton on 21/08/08 12:14:56 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles